Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘AI’

The flood of AI art has led to a lot of commentary, some thoughtful, some otherwise, by pundits, tech gurus, and artists themselves.

Here’s cartoonist Matthew Inman sharing his perspective on why he finds AI art problematic.

A cartoonist’s review of AI art – The Oatmeal

…I need you to know from one artist to another, that every mark you make on a page even a squiggly, imperfect one is still beautiful.

* * *

Read Full Post »

SkyKnit

As a sometime knitter and pattern designer, I thought this story about a neural network learning to knit (or not!) both funny and telling.

SkyKnit: How an AI Took Over an Adult Knitting Community

Prodded by a knitter on the knitting forum Ravelry, Shane trained a type of neural network on a series of over 500 sets of knitting instructions. Then, she generated new instructions, which members of the Ravelry community have actually attempted to knit.

Shane nicknamed the whole effort “Project Hilarious Disaster.” The community called it SkyKnit.

It’s been a few years since this project started (the article is from 2018) and I’m sure AI has progressed since then. Still funny!

Full disclosure: I have been known to visit Ravelry. It’s an excellent resource, most of the time!

* * *

Read Full Post »

I don’t usually curse, and when I do I try to pick my moments. Now that we’re in the AI era, here’s one such moment:

“Just give me the f***ing links!”—Cursing disables Google’s AI overviews

If you search Google for a way to turn off the company’s AI-powered search results, you may well get an AI Overview telling you that AI Overviews can’t be directly disabled in Google Search. But if you instead ask Google how to turn off “f***ing Google AI results,” you’ll get a standard set of useful web suggestions without any AI Overview at the top. (asterisks added to protect delicate reader sensibilities)

Seems to work with DuckDuckGo too. A handy tip for the modern age!

* * *

Read Full Post »

I recently subscribed to We’re Here, a “nice little email for people from Earth” that originated from Hank and John Green’s Nerdfighteria. One issue last month included a thought piece I found interesting: The Tragedy of Prevention.

The thesis? “A tricky thing about modern society is that no one has any idea when they don’t die.”

That line stuck with me, and I’ve been toying with it for the past month. How, I wondered, could we be made more aware of those moments in particular, and our good luck in general?

The tragedy of prevention goes like this: The most effective way to save lives (prevention) is the least noticeable, which leads us to undervaluing it in our individual choices, in what we celebrate, and in public policy. That undervaluing of prevention leads to a great deal of needless death and suffering…

If every person who had their life saved by a vaccine, or an airbag, or a clean air regulation felt the same as a firefighter carrying an unconscious person out of a burning building, I think we’d feel a lot better about humanity, and maybe that would help us move forward more effectively.

Surely, I thought, there must be a website out there that will tell me all the times I coulda woulda shoulda died? When a search turned up nothing useful (and a whole lot that wasn’t, and wasn’t something I wanted to wade through), I decided to put AI to good use. This was my hypothetical:

Q: I am a 50-year old white man living in the US. You are a doctor specializing in historical causes of mortality, including vaccine-preventable diseases and other health-care preventable causes of mortality. Tell me all the moments in my life where I would have died if this were the year 1898. 

I picked 1898 because it had all the lessons of the 19th century but none of the World Wars of the 20th. It’s also just after the Gilded Age, a time currently being showcased as a time of All Good Things, at least for robber barons those in power.

What was the answer?

ChatGPT: This is a fascinating and sobering thought experiment. Assuming you’re a 50-year-old white man in the U.S. in 2025, you would have been born in 1975. Let’s now imagine that you lived your exact same life—same exposures, environment, risks, and medical events—but in 1898. Here are the major moments where you very likely would have died, or your survival would have been highly unlikely, given the state of medicine, vaccines, and public health at that time.

The answer started with fun diseases like diphtheria, measles and scarlet fever and moved on from there. It summarized a lot, but even this abbreviated trek through a hypothetical life over a century ago made me think: How lucky are we? 

If you’re curious, here’s the full answer,* complete with terrifying scenarios like no antibiotics, insulin or public sanitation, life expectancies under 50, and pretty much every disease ever from The Oregon Trail:

* Fair warning, I haven’t fact checked all of these specific numbers, but the overall point is both relevant and on target.

1. Infancy and Childhood (0–5 years)

🚼 Risk of Infant Death from Infectious Diseases

  • Diphtheria, Pertussis (Whooping Cough), Measles, Scarlet Fever, and Smallpox were all common causes of childhood death.
  • You would not have been vaccinated, as the only routinely available vaccine in 1898 was for smallpox.
  • Infant mortality rate in 1898 was around 150 per 1,000 live births, meaning a 15% chance of dying before age 1.

📍Moment of Likely Death : Age 0–5 — Measles, Whooping Cough, or Diphtheria.
If you got any of these common childhood infections—as most kids did—you would face a high chance of dying from pneumonia, encephalitis, or airway obstruction.

2. Appendicitis, Accidents, or Infections (Any Age)

⚠️ Lack of Antibiotics and Surgery

  • Appendicitis, if you ever had it, would have been a death sentence due to lack of surgical techniques and no antibiotics.
  • Strep throat, infected cuts, dental abscesses, or pneumonia could have killed you due to the absence of penicillin (discovered 1928, not widely used until the 1940s).

📍Moment of Likely Death : Any bacterial infection that in your modern life was easily treated with antibiotics—especially in your teens or 20s.

3. Injuries and Trauma

🩸 Modern Trauma Care Didn’t Exist

  • Car accidents didn’t exist yet, but horseback riding accidents, industrial injuries, and farm equipment injuries were common.
  • No blood banks, IV fluids, or sterile technique meant internal injuries or bleeding often led to death.

📍Moment of Likely Death : Any serious physical injury. Even a broken leg with complications like infection or blood loss could have been fatal.

4. Adulthood Illnesses

❤️ Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Chronic Disease

  • In 1898, there were no treatments for hypertension, high cholesterol, or heart disease. If you had any of these risk factors, your risk of death in your 40s or 50s was vastly higher.
  • Diabetes was also nearly untreatable. Insulin wasn’t discovered until 1921. You would likely die within a year of diagnosis.

📍Moment of Likely Death : Undiagnosed or untreated chronic illness. If you’ve ever taken blood pressure meds, cholesterol meds, or insulin—you would have died without them.

5. Infectious Disease in Adulthood

🦠 Tuberculosis, Influenza, and Pneumonia

  • TB was called “consumption” and was a leading cause of death.
  • The “old man’s friend” (pneumonia) often claimed people in midlife or earlier.
  • Influenza pandemics occurred repeatedly—including in 1918.

📍Moment of Likely Death : Any bout with flu or pneumonia. Without antivirals, antibiotics, or supportive hospital care, this could easily have been fatal.

6. Surgical Interventions

🛠️ No Modern Anesthesia or Sterile Technique

  • If you’ve ever had a hernia repair, tonsillectomy, gallbladder surgery, or even dental work—your risk of dying from infection or surgical shock would have been significant.
  • Hospitals were places people went to die; wealthy people often avoided them.

📍Moment of Likely Death : Any surgery. Even minor operations were high-risk.

7. Cancer

🔬 No Diagnostics, No Chemotherapy, No Radiation

  • Cancer was often only diagnosed very late—usually through symptoms like bleeding or swelling.
  • Surgical removal was often impossible or fatal due to poor technique and infection.

📍Moment of Likely Death : If you ever had or will have cancer, you’d likely die quickly and in pain.

Survival Odds in 1898

  • Life expectancy for white men in 1898 was about 46 years.
  • As a 50-year-old in 2025, you’re already past the average life expectancy of your 1898 counterpart.
  • Public sanitation, antibiotics, vaccines, and modern surgery have already saved your life many times over—even if you’ve never had a dramatic medical crisis.

Bonus: Things You Would Not Die From in 1898

  • Car crashes (few cars existed).
  • Obesity-related diabetes (far less common).
  • Opioid overdose (though morphine addiction was real, it was not yet a mass crisis).
  • Mass shootings or modern warfare (depending on your background and profession).

And that’s the beauty of prevention!

* * *

Read Full Post »

One thing that often happens when writers talk about writing is a discussion of the creative voice. Separate from the critical voice, the creative voice has been described as “a two-year old who just wants to play.”* It is key to writing.

Problems occur when that urge to play is shut down by the critical voice. That is the side of your mind that is trying to keep your child self from running out into the street without looking both ways, from getting baked** in public, from forgetting your homework, or otherwise making mistakes.

The critical voice is very little help when it comes to getting words on the page. It is pretty good, however, at keeping you from being run over and/or caught making up cases in legal filings. Just, you know, for example.

Bad ChatGPT, bad!

It occurs to me that in some ways, AI is that two-year old running around, trying to give you answers without thinking too hard about whether or not they are the right answers.

It needs a parental figure.

Am I thinking of a caretaker program that follows the AI around like a nanny, keeping it from sticking its finger in a light socket and cleaning up after it?

Yes, yes I am. (Fun story idea idea, too, my inner two-year old must be on the job.)

And hey, we’re already teaching AI mindfulness, why not this?

* I’m sure lots of people have said some version of this but I’m thinking specifically of Dean Wesley Smith.

** I meant to type “naked” but this works too.

* * *

Read Full Post »

This is a brief note for any iPhone (or Mac, see note) users out there.

Apple releases iOS 18.3 with AI-powered Apple Intelligence on by default

Apple has kicked off iOS 18.3, iPadOS 18.3, and MacOS 15.3 with one significant change affecting AI. Since its debut, Apple Intelligence has required the extra step of actually turning it on or opting in. But with the new versions, Apple’s AI feature is enabled by default for eligible devices.

Sigh. I’m not a Luddite but that doesn’t mean I want AI rummaging around in my phone whenever it wants. If you feel that way too, or just want to extend your battery life, you can disable this new annoying “feature.”

Fortunately, it’s easy to do: How to turn off Apple Intelligence now that it’s on by default

Disable Apple Intelligence by navigating to “Settings” > “Apple Intelligence & Siri” and toggle off the button next to “Apple Intelligence.”

Enjoy your (temporary?) escape from the AI powers that be!

Note: The latest Mac OS (15.3 as of this writing) also defaults Apple Intelligence to *on.* Act accordingly, folks!

* * *

Photo by David Monje on Unsplash

Read Full Post »

A few thoughts on AI from one of the leading sci-fi writers of the day.

Scalzi on Film: Hollywood Totally Lied to Us About AI: Why Cinematic Cyborgs Are So Much Smarter Than What We Have in the Real World

Behold! Science has caught up to fiction, and the age of Artificial Intelligence, long promised by science fiction in film, literature, and video games, is here! And in this golden age…tech companies expend vast amounts of energy to create search engine assistants trained on partially or fully stolen data, who tell us it’s okay to eat rocks and put glue on pizza, and chatbots who “hallucinate” answers to queries, i.e. confabulate bullshit based on a statistical regression to the textual mean. Our “AI,” as it turns out, is less intelligent than a chicken, even if it has a better vocabulary.

Will the technology continue to change? Certainly, and with rapidity. Will it move more concretely from “applied statistics” to a more humanized “artificial intelligence”? We shall see!

* * *

Photo by Jonathan Kemper on Unsplash

Read Full Post »

Maybe AI can help:

Food Mood — Google Arts & Culture

Get inspiration for your next meal and create new recipes mixing influences from two cuisines, generated with the help of Google AI.

I decided to mix Ireland and Sweden. On the face of it, at least, the basic concept of baked salmon and mashed potatoes wasn’t terrible (although the AI-generated image was a little off base).

Or break out the chips. You do you.

* * *

Photo by Ryan Quintal on Unsplash

Read Full Post »

Fellow Writers of the Future winner (2018) N.R.M. Roshak has started an excellent weekly newsletter on AI. Check it out if you’re interested in what’s happening in the field, how this tech is influencing social, business, and other arenas, or why I post results like this: Bright Colors, Happy Tone.

View back issues and subscribe here: Newsletter: AI Week.

It’s not for experts and it’s extremely readable. It’s really aimed at science fiction writers and readers: non-experts (like me) who are interested in the impact of this tech on society.

Enjoy!

* * *

Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

Read Full Post »

I’d hoped to carve out some writing time today but instead I’m dealing with a lot of weird tech issues, some of which are concrete problems and some just disappointments.

Here’s an example of the latter. Note the prompt.

AI prompt: A metal cyborg unicorn bright colors happy tone

No, AI. Just… no.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »