Note: This post is long but both Ray Bradbury and Jane Austen make an appearance, so there’s that.
* * *
We keep a little pad of paper stuck to the side of the fridge to use as a grocery list. Every couple of weeks I get tired of crossing things out and trying to remember what we actually bought and what I only think we bought, and I start fresh. Yesterday I pulled the latest iteration of the list off the pad and turned to toss it in the recycling bin, when the back of the sheet caught my attention. It was blank.
Not a big surprise there, think of all the Post-its you’ve used one side of in the last decades. But! It struck me how much times have changed. Wealth is a continually moving target, and so are our measures of it.
I mean you’re warm in winter and cool in summer and can watch the World Series on TV. You can do anything in the world. You literally live better than Rockefeller. His unparalleled fortune couldn’t buy what we now take for granted, whether the field is—to name just a few—transportation, entertainment, communication or medical services. Rockefeller certainly had power and fame; he could not, however, live as well as my neighbors now do.
— Warren Buffett, quoted in Getting the Goalpost to Stop Moving
And I’ve always liked this Ray Bradbury quote:
* * *
In the case of paper, we’ve got both more and better.
Once upon a time, people had to use both sides of the paper. Heck, once upon a time, people didn’t have paper, and after its invention it took centuries to become what we think of today: cheap, high quality, readily available, reliable information storage, bird cage liner, and paper plane in waiting.
Even after paper became widespread in the Western world, wood pulp paper was terrible. Like, sheets of nasty grey pulp held together with weird glues and chemicals that slowly (or not so slowly) destroyed itself.
“Unfortunately, early wood-based paper deteriorated as time passed, meaning that much of the output of newspapers and books from this period either has disintegrated or is in poor condition; some has been photographed or digitized (scanned). The acid nature of the paper, caused by the use of alum, produced what has been called a slow fire, slowly converting the paper to ash.”
— History of paper – Wikipedia
* * *
Depending on the circumstances, writers also did their best to use every inch of a page. Part of that was the paper itself, and part was the cost of postage. (Insert obligatory statement of love for modern postal services here!)
Click through to see a letter from Jane Austen to her sister Cassandra using cross writing, designed to condense as much information as possible onto a given sheet:
Here’s another example from Ontario:
* * *
It turns out that paper wasn’t quite as expensive as I’d thought, but the good stuff still wasn’t cheap.
Based on paper purchases by individuals from the 1570s to the 1640s, paper was “roughly a penny for six sheets… To put this in perspective, the average laborer making 6-12 pence a day could purchase up to 75 sheets of paper with a day’s wages. (Was early modern writing paper expensive? – The Collation)
Later, Regency-ish England did have additional duties that made quality paper, particularly in book-sized quantities, more expensive.
“The excise duty on paper was a frequent problem for all printers and publishers. The reorganisation of the duty in 1794, whereby it was charged by weight rather than ream, had the effect of making the burden heavier”
— Half the cost of a book | OUPblog
So, not prohibitive for a person of good fortune in search of stationery or a good novel, but not nothing.
* * *
In researching this I came across a wealth of fascinating economic information. For example, what was one shilling worth in London during the mid-1700s? So many things!
- Dinner in a steakhouse – beef, bread and beer, plus tip
- Sign-on bonus for army recruitment: The king’s Shilling
- Admission to Vauxhall Gardens
- Admission to Ranelagh Gardens (although it could be as much as 2 guineas on masquerade nights)
- A dish of beef at Vauxhall
- 1lb of perfumed soap
- Postage of a one page letter from London to New York
- 1lb of Parmesan cheese
— 18th century cost of living – redcoats history
Aaaaand this is where I fell into an internet black hole on commodity pricing vs. real wages in Regency etc. England, and had to take a break. (Step away from the seminal economics investigation of Seven Centuries of Real Income per Wage Earner and Super-cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century!)
* * *
Since we’re discussing costs, let’s sketch a quick portrait of sample economic expenses for gentlefolk around the time of Jane Austen:
Costs of Living During the Regency Period
- Silk stockings — 12 shillings (£20.38 or $40.24 in today’s currency!)
- Woolen stockings — 2 shillings 6 pence (£4.25 or $8.39)
- A white silk handkerchief — 6 shillings (£10.19 or $20.12)
- A pair of gloves — 4 shillings (£6.79 or $13.41)
- A simple white dress — 5 shillings (£8.49 or $16.77)
- A fan — 5 shillings (£8.49 or $16.77)
- Simple shoes 6-11 shillings (£10.19-18.68 or $20.12-36.89)
- Walking boots 2 pounds (£67.92 or $134.12)
- Cotton fabric — 1 shilling per yard (£1.70 or $3.36)
- Enough cotton fabric for a dress — 6 shillings ($20.12)
- Velveteen fabric — 2 shillings 10 pence (£4.81 or $9.50)
- Enough silk fabric for a dress — 1 pound 6 shillings (£44.15 or $87.18)
- Shawls — if real silk or Kashmir could run £200-300
- Shoes — men’s shoes went from 10 /6 to several pounds for boots so I think the ladies shoes will be in the same range.
- A silk purse– a coin purse sort of thing– 2 s
For more of the nitty gritty, including detailed tables (3 cows equalled a pair of coach horses), see “How Wealthy is Mr. Darcy – Really? Pounds and Dollars in the World of Pride and Prejudice” by James Heldman.
* * *
How did we get here? Right, a grocery list, and my appreciation that so many of us now have access to things like affordable paper, postal service, and oh yes, literacy!
J.R. Johnson 
You must be logged in to post a comment.